Founders and research teams

For founders

Moving from science toward a venture or preparing a spinout? This page sets expectations: who we serve, what we deliver, and what happens when you register interest.

Who this is for

Researcher-led teams and founders building innovations where women's health outcomes are central: therapeutics, diagnostics, devices, biomarkers, and digital tools with serious clinical intent.

You may sit in a university, hospital, institute, or early company. What matters is that you are close to decisions where evidence plans, regulatory shape, and venture milestones must line up — not whether you already call it a startup.

In scope (indicative)

  • Defined problem, testable thesis, and a path to decision-grade evidence over time
  • Willingness to work to staged milestones and explicit gate reviews
  • Alignment with institutional governance and conflict-of-interest norms
  • Need for translation support: regulatory, trial, reimbursement, or venture narrative — not only undifferentiated cash

Not in scope (indicative)

  • Pure wellness or lifestyle products without a clinical evidence path proportionate to claims
  • Projects that cannot articulate the next uncertainty to remove or the next capital or partner milestone
  • Requests for medical advice, legal advice, or guaranteed investment — we are not a substitute for your advisors or investors

Final criteria will be published when program settings are confirmed.

What a strong candidate looks like (examples)

The lists above are deliberately high level. Below are illustrative examples only — not an exhaustive checklist or a guarantee of fit.

In scope — examples

  • A university researcher with a novel endometriosis diagnostic that has completed proof-of-concept work but needs regulatory pathway mapping and clinical trial design support aligned to what investors and payers will ask for next.
  • A hospital-linked team developing a device or digital tool for maternal or pelvic health where the next uncertainty is evidence shape, classification, or adoption in real clinical workflows — not simply building more features.
  • An early company with a biomarker or therapeutic lead in women's health that can describe the next de-risking step and the milestone that would justify a larger funding round or partnership conversation.
  • A digital health product with a serious clinical evidence path proportionate to its claims (for example, outcomes tied to guideline-relevant endpoints), not lifestyle positioning alone.

Out of scope — examples

  • A consumer wellness app with no proportionate clinical evidence requirement or credible path to decision-grade outcomes.
  • A general e-commerce or beauty brand reframed as“women's health” without a translational or evidence agenda.
  • A request for undifferentiated grant funding with no articulated next uncertainty, partner milestone, or governance alignment.

What to expect if you register interest

  1. You submit role, contact details, and optional context (stage, institution, modality).
  2. We use that to triage outreach as program design and governance are finalised — not as a scored application.
  3. You may receive clarifying questions or information on next steps when intake processes open. Nothing in the form is an offer, admission, or funding commitment.
  4. When production workflows and privacy controls are live, you would receive a confirmation and notice at the email you provide. The current site may use a demonstration endpoint — see FAQ.

Practical support

Support is structured around recurring failure modes: regulatory and trial design choices, reimbursement and access realism, investable narrative, capital readiness, mentor access, and follow-on financing positioning with women's health context, not generic accelerator content.

  • Milestone-based funding tied to de-risking steps
  • Working sessions on evidence and regulatory path, not slide polishing alone
  • Introductions when diligence readiness and partner timing align